🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are watching closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of countries are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that smartphones and apps are "taking away our kids' childhood". A law is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban is "an tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged parliament to approve a bill increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a related step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged families to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is granted. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a good starting point," said one MEP behind the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "supported by strong research".

Earlier, support built behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous platform posts contends that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," stated a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, legislation is mostly happening at the state government level amid federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws requiring parental consent for minors to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from some politicians to mimic the Australian path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Apart from these regions, additional nations are also exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations adopt a more measured tone. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The body highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

Even as this international debate evolves, the actions of the Australian government and its followers show that governments globally are increasingly willing to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.